The DMS program seeks to achieve this mission by focusing on these goals. The metrics display how we work to meet our goals.
The mission of the Lincoln Memorial University-School of Medical Sciences, Doctor of Medical Science program is to equip qualified clinicians and medical educators with evidence-based, advanced knowledge and skills to meet the needs of primary care, to develop leaders in the medical profession, and to promote scholarship, mentorship, and discipline-specific expertise.
The DMS program equips graduates to contribute to clinical practice, medical education, leadership, and scholarship, supporting the advancement of patient care and health professions education through informed leadership, collaboration, and lifelong learning.
The DMS program seeks to achieve this mission by focusing on these goals. The metrics display how we work to meet our goals.
To ensure our doctoral candidates receive instruction at the highest level of professional practice, the program maintains rigorous standards for faculty expertise and instructional quality. We ensure compliance with terminal degree requirements and clinical/educational specializations through annual CV audits and performance evaluations. This expert-led environment is monitored via student feedback (End of Course Surveys) and longitudinal data from our alumni, ensuring that our teaching faculty remain current in the evolving medical education and clinical landscapes.
|
Assessment Measure |
Data Source |
Target Benchmark |
Actual Performance |
|
Faculty Qualification Audit |
Official Degree & License Verification |
100% Current & Qualified |
Results Expected February 2027 |
|
Teaching Specialty Alignment |
Faculty Experience tracker |
100% Background Match |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Faculty Performance Reviews |
Annual Performance Evaluations |
100% “Satisfactory” or Higher |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Faculty Ongoing Training |
Professional Development Tracker |
100% Professional Dev. Participation |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Instructional Effectiveness |
Student Course Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Expertise Perception |
Faculty & Alumni Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
Professionalism is not just taught; it is cultivated through institutional culture and modeled behavior. We utilize a multi-source feedback model to measure this goal, incorporating a 360-degree evaluation within DMS 900 – where students, peers, and faculty assess professional behavior. By triangulating these results with staff, faculty, and End of Program Surveys, the program ensures that our graduates enter the workforce as ethical leaders who prioritize mentorship and core values in their professional interactions.
|
Assessment Measure |
Data Source |
Target Benchmark |
Actual Performance |
|
Student Professional Conduct Assessment |
Student 360-Degree Evaluations |
Average score ≥80% |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Faculty Mentorship Quality |
Student Advisor Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Career Integrity & Values |
Alumni Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Professionalism of Program Culture |
Faculty & Staff Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
The program leverages advanced educational technology to bridge the distance in an online environment and provide a seamless learning experience. We measure the effectiveness of these tools by evaluating both student accessibility and faculty instructional utility. By analyzing the intersection of technical support satisfaction and actual learning enhancement (via End of Course and Faculty Surveys), we proactively update our digital infrastructure to ensure it meets the rigorous demands of a doctoral-level curriculum.
|
Assessment Measure |
Data Source |
Target Benchmark |
Actual Performance |
|
Learning Experience Quality |
Student Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Course Accessibility Review |
CTLE Course Design Standards Checklist |
100% Compliance |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Technical Support Reliability |
Student Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Real-World Technology Value |
Alumni Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
Mastery of disciplinary knowledge is verified through major-specific capstone activities designed to measure critical inquiry and application. For the Medical Education major, this is demonstrated through the DMS 917 Final Project; for the Clinical Medicine major, success is measured via longitudinal pre- and post-curricular clinical growth. The program ensures these measures are fruitful by tracking how graduates use this knowledge to advance professional practice and scholarship as evidenced in our alumni survey reports.
|
Assessment Measure |
Data Source |
Target Benchmark |
Actual Performance |
|
Clinical Knowledge Growth |
Pre/Post Curricular Exam (Clinical) |
Cohort Mean Growth ≥15% |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Medical Education Content Mastery |
Key Assessment Mastery |
Average score ≥80% |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Advanced Knowledge Confidence |
Student Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Professional Value/Success |
Alumni Career & Scholarship Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
The program prepares graduates for the leadership role that aligns with doctoral education through specific leadership experiences. Clinical Medicine majors demonstrate readiness through their Clinician in Charge role, while Medical Education majors formulate and submit an advanced Leadership Philosophy Statement (DMS 920). We validate our success in this goal by monitoring alumni career trajectory, aiming for over 50% of our graduates to occupy formal leadership roles in their clinics, health systems, or academic programs.
|
Assessment Measure |
Data Source |
Target Benchmark |
Actual Performance |
|
Leadership Content Mastery |
Leadership Assessment Mastery |
Average score ≥80% |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Leadership Confidence |
Student Feedback |
Rating ≥3.75/5 |
Results expected February 2027 |
|
Professional Career Advancement |
Alumni Feedback |
≥50% in Leadership Roles |
Results expected February 2027 |